Panel offers peek behind scenes of separation plan

Other Manual Translations: français português español

It was love of The United Methodist Church that brought 16 — sometimes hostile — people to a point of agreement for a path forward for the worldwide church.

Even though the agreement is to split, participants still talked about loving each other in a livestreamed discussion Jan. 13 to explain how the Protocol of Reconciliation & Grace Through Separation was formed.

“We started with quite a bit of tension and, really, hostility in the room,” said Bishop Christian Alsted, Nordic-Baltic Episcopal Area. “But a sense of hope and the possibility of finding common ground emerged. This was a rollercoaster ride … sometimes we wanted to get off but all stayed.”

Front and center of the group was famed mediator Kenneth Feinberg, who helped the United Methodists representing strongly held, diverse viewpoints, get to a yes.

Feinberg said the question he posed to the group was, “What is the alternative to decades of strife, tensions and stress?"

Jan Lawrence, representing progressives, said the team was blessed to have Feinberg. 

Watch here

Graphic by Laurens Glass, UM News
Archive of Jan. 13 Discussion:
UM News interviews protocol developers

Downloadable PDF: 
Comparing plans headed to GC2020
“To be successful, we felt like we needed something different,” she said. “Our answer to that was having a professional mediator join us.”

Feinberg, who donated his services to the denomination, said he knew from the first day that he had the right group of people in the room. He also said he also had two secret weapons: Rick Godfrey and Wendy Bloom of Kirkland and Ellis, a Washington and Chicago law firm.

Tim Tanton, United Methodist News, moderated the panel.

Tanton said one of the most asked questions since the announcement of the protocol is, “Why is it the traditionalists are the ones to leave?”

The Rev. Keith Boyette, representing traditionalists, said, “By agreeing to leave, the traditionalists have chosen to set the church free from this conflict.”

At the end of the 2019 special General Conference, the traditional side won the vote, but the conflict did not end, he explained.

Progressives and centrists made it clear that they would continue to resist and were not willing to leave the denomination. 

People also are wondering about who was and was not included in the mediation team.

Feinberg said that with too many people, mediation won’t work.

“Despite the parameters of the size of the group, we still had a pretty diverse group of people representing a broad theological perspective,” said the Rev. Junius Dotson, representing centrists. There were also conversations with others outside of the 16 in the mediation room, he added.

The group had to agree on restructuring proposals, governing proposals and finances. The work unfolded over six two-day sessions.

As part of the process, the group brought in church financial experts to arrive at the decision of $25 million for traditionalists to start a new denomination, $39 million for ethnic caucus and Africa University and $2 million for seed money for any other denominations that might start.

If the protocol is adopted, the process for deciding where someone would affiliate is similar for clergy, annual conferences and local churches, explained Bishop Thomas Bickerton.

Read more

Diverse leaders’ group offers separation plan

Reaction aplenty to separation plan

Feinberg kept church negotiators at table

Resistance to Traditional Plan accelerates

Protocol process painful but fruitful

The document "Protocol of Reconciliation & Grace Through Separation" shares the proposal of a diverse group of United Methodist bishops and other leaders. Click here.

The group also released a Frequently Asked Questions document. Click here
“We will help each person in the determinations they need to make in this very tender and vulnerable time for the church,” he said. 

A team from this group is now working on legislation that has to be constitutional and translated into the official languages of the church, said the Rev. Tom Berlin, centrist.

Ultimately, it is the delegates who will decide on whether the protocol is accepted.

“If this or a similar plan does not pass, it will be catastrophic,” said Bishop John Yambasu, Sierra Leone. Yambasu called the first meeting of traditionalists, centrists and progressives together after the 2019 General Conference.

He left the 2019 conference filled with concern, he said.

“Going back home, I heard a voice say to me, ‘John, you’ve got to do something.’”

Berlin said all the meetings began in prayer and in moments of tension, they sought the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

“Those prayer moments were opportunities by the entire team to recognize human limits,” Yambasu said.

Gilbert is a news writer for United Methodist News. Contact her at 615-742-5470 or [email protected]. To read more United Methodist news, subscribe to the free Daily or Weekly Digests.

Sign up for our newsletter!

umnews-subscriptions
General Church
Moses Kumar discusses the denomination’s budget at the 2020 Pre-General Conference Briefing in January in Nashville, Tenn. Kumar, the top executive of the General Council on Finance and Administration, helped lead a Feb. 21 online meeting dealing with the denomination’s financial challenges. File photo by Mike DuBose, UM News.

Looking at financial impact of GC2020 plans

No matter what happens at General Conference, United Methodist leaders predict a loss of funding. That makes planning a budget especially tough.
General Church
The top portion of an incorporation application for “The Florida Methodist Church” filed Feb. 7, 2020. Three Florida Conference cabinet members filed the papers, although two later decided to remove their names. Document from the Florida Secretary of State’s office.

Cabinet members filed papers for new church group

Three Florida Conference leaders joined in incorporating ʽThe Florida Methodist Church,’ but two later decided not to help start an organization separate from The United Methodist Church.
General Church
A delegate holds her voting device aloft as she contemplates a Feb. 26, 2019, vote during the special General Conference in St. Louis. General Conference organizers have named a think tank to consider how best to process legislation at the 2020 General Conference. Photo by Paul Jeffrey, UM News.

Think tank to look at GC2020 possibilities

The commission that plans General Conference has named a group to look at how delegates can process legislation “the best way possible.”