Court Rules two GC2019 petitions unconstitutional

Translate Page

Two General Conference 2019 petitions related to potential plans for the future of The United Methodist Church have been declared unconstitutional by the denomination’s top court. 

The decision was in response to a petition for a declaratory decision received by the United Methodist Judicial Council Feb. 22 from the Council of Bishops.

Petition 90052 is unconstitutional, the court said in Decision 1375 “because it infringes upon the right of the annual conference to vote on all matters relating to the character and conference relations of its clergy members,” as provided under Paragraph 33 of the Constitution.

A second petition, Petition 90078, is unconstitutional because it would create a global episcopacy committee, the decision said. That petition is part of the Modified Traditional Plan.

Petition 90052 would add language eliminating “the entire supervisory response process” for complaints related to violations of the denomination’s prohibitions against homosexuality and the creation of a special committee on investigation to handle judicial complaints. The prohibitions against being a “self-avowed practicing homosexual” or performing same-sex marriage or union celebrations are found in Paragraph 2702.1(b). 

But the council said that both Judicial Council Decision 1296 and Paragraph 33 “clearly stipulate” that the committee on investigation for such complaints resides with an annual conference. 

“By removing this body from the annual conference and placing it under the authority of the General Conference and Colleges of Bishops, Petition 90052 infringes upon the constitutional right of an annual conference, particularly of the clergy and lay members of the committee on investigation, to vote on all matters relating to the character and conference relations of its clergy members, and is, therefore, unconstitutional.”

Creating a global episcopacy committee through Petition 90078 to handle requests for “transfers of bishops across jurisdictional or central conference lines” also is problematic, Judicial Council said.

While the constitution permits transfers of bishops from one jurisdiction to another under specific conditions, “there is no parallel provision for transfers of bishops along central conference lines,” the decision said. “It is beyond General Conference’s power to fill this gap. 

“Absent clear grant of constitutional authority, transfers from one central conference to another central conference and from a jurisdictional conference to a central conference are constitutionally prohibited. The creation of the global episcopacy committee would also blur the lines between the responsibilities of the jurisdictional committees on episcopacy and those of the central conferences.”

The ruling also noted that the Book of Discipline stipulates “that the complaint process against bishops is handled by the jurisdictional conference and the jurisdictional committee on episcopacy.” Placing that responsibility under a global episcopacy committee would be unconstitutional, the council said. 

Bloom is the assistant news editor for United Methodist News Service and is based in New York.

Follow her at https://twitter.com/umcscribe or contact her at 615-742-5470 or [email protected]. To read more United Methodist news, subscribe to the free Daily or Weekly Digests.

Like what you're reading? Support the ministry of UM News! Your support ensures the latest denominational news, dynamic stories and informative articles will continue to connect our global community. Make a tax-deductible donation at ResourceUMC.org/GiveUMCom.

Sign up for our newsletter!

UMNEWS-SUBSCRIPTION
Judicial Council
Bishop Minerva Carcaño speaks about The United Methodist Church's social witness during the 2020 Pre-General Conference Briefing in Nashville, Tenn. The bishop has been suspended with pay since March. In a memorandum released Oct. 26, the Judicial Council declined to take up the bishop’s case at this stage of the complaint process. File photo by Mike DuBose, UM News.

Church court declines to take up bishop’s case

Bishop Minerva Carcaño has been suspended from episcopal duties since March. While not naming the bishop, The United Methodist Church’s top court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction to take up a complaint against a bishop at this stage of the judicial process.
Congregations
St. Andrew United Methodist Church in Plano, Texas, has decided to leave The United Methodist Church. But the decision was made by St. Andrew’s executive committee, not through a two-thirds congregational vote as required in Paragraph 2553 of the United Methodist Book of Discipline. Photo courtesy of St. Andrew United Methodist Church.

Megachurch takes unusual disaffiliation route

The executive committee of St. Andrew United Methodist, in Plano, Texas, decided the church should depart The United Methodist Church. North Texas Conference Bishop Michael McKee says church members were denied “voice and vote.”
General Church
With some congregations considering leaving The United Methodist Church or just wondering about its future, Ask The UMC offers a series of questions and answers to help clear up some common misperceptions or misinformation around disaffiliation. Graphic by Laurens Glass, United Methodist Communications.

Ask The UMC: Is The United Methodist Church really... ? (Part 5)

Do we have to choose between The UMC and the GMC? What happens if an elected delegate disaffiliates?