Judicial Council sets special session

The United Methodist Judicial Council will consider items deferred from its October meeting during a special session just prior the 2019 General Conference in St. Louis. Submissions for the top court’s special session are limited to bodies authorized to file petitions by The United Methodist Book of Discipline. 2017 file photo by Mike DuBose, UMNS.
The United Methodist Judicial Council will consider items deferred from its October meeting during a special session just prior the 2019 General Conference in St. Louis. Submissions for the top court’s special session are limited to bodies authorized to file petitions by The United Methodist Book of Discipline. 2017 file photo by Mike DuBose, UMNS.

The United Methodist Judicial Council will consider five petitions deferred from its fall meeting during a Feb. 19-26 special session in St. Louis.

The session will begin just prior to the special General Conference, which meets Feb. 23-26 at the America’s Center Convention Complex in St. Louis to consider possible plans to resolve the decades-old conflict over homosexuality. Judicial Council will continue to meet during General Conference, as needed, when it receives requests from that body to consider.

Submissions for the top court’s special session are only for requests for action “that must be considered prior to the beginning of the called session of the General Conference,” the Rev. Lui Tran, Judicial Council secretary, said in a statement. Requests are limited to bodies authorized to file petitions by Paragraphs 2609 and 2610 in The United Methodist Book of Discipline, Tran said.

Nov. 30 is the submission deadline for the February special session and a tentative docket will be released sometime after that date.

Any amended opening briefs from those who previously submitted such briefs for the five docket items are due Dec. 14. Requests for an oral hearing also are due by Dec. 14. Amended original reply briefs must be submitted by Dec. 24. Any new submissions related to the docket items must be approved by the Judicial Council president.

Docket items deferred by the council in October include:

  • A review of a decision of law by Baltimore-Washington Bishop LaTrelle Easterling, who ruled during the 2018 annual conference session that two individuals the Board of Ordained Ministry had approved were not eligible for ordination and commissioning because they are “self-avowed practicing homosexuals.”
  • A request by the Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters about mistakes made during General Conference 2016 regarding the retirement of central conference bishops.
  • A review of a decision of law by North Texas Bishop Michael McKee that a question on a tabled resolution related to the issue of human sexuality was out of order.
  • Reviews of two separate decisions of law by Greater New Jersey Bishop John Schol.  The first is about participation in a lawsuit filed against the New Jersey State Board of Education and Acting Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Education. The second is about the scheduling of “church superconferences” at locations other than the involved local churches.

Regular filing dates, available on the Judicial Council calendar, will apply to the court’s spring meeting, which is April 23-26 in Evanston, Illinois.

Bloom is the assistant news editor for United Methodist News Service and is based in New York.

Follow her at https://twitter.com/umcscribe or contact her at 615-742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org. To read more United Methodist news, subscribe to the free Daily or Weekly Digests.

Sign up for our newsletter!

SUBSCRIBE

Latest News

Judicial Council
Bishop Cynthia Fierro Harvey addresses the United Methodist Judicial Council meeting in Zurich. The council ruled Oct. 26 that the One Church Plan is largely constitutional but found problems with the Traditional Plan. Photo by Diane Degnan, UMCom.

Court: One Church Plan largely constitutional

In review of Way Forward plans, United Methodist Judicial Council flags Traditional Plan petitions that would require change; declines to rule on a third plan.
Judicial Council
Bishop Kenneth H. Carter Jr. addresses the United Methodist Judicial Council meeting in Zurich on Oct. 23. Carter is president of the denomination's Council of Bishops. Photo by Diane Degnan, UMCom.

Court ruling propels GC2019 strategizing

Amendments to One Church and Traditional plans are likely after Judicial Council weighed in on constitutional questions.
Judicial Council
The Rev. Gary Graves, secretary of the General Conference, addresses the Judicial Council on the question of whether the denomination’s top legislative assembly has the authority to expel a delegate for violating General Conference rules, regardless of whether a reserve delegate would be available to fill that vacancy. Photo by Diane Degnan, UMCom.

Top court releases October decisions

Rulings from the United Methodist Judicial Council meeting include those related to Oct. 23 oral hearings on clergy appeals and removal of General Conference delegates.