Support UM News on World Press Freedom Day: Give to help sustain and expand the storytelling capacity of UM News. Your donation today will transform information into inspiration and ensure we can continue sharing stories of God’s work in the world through The UMC. Help us reach our $10,000 goal and keep this vital ministry fair, faithful, trusted and free for all!

Court clarifies decision on clergy session voting

The United Methodist Church’s top court has clarified a 2019 ruling related to the administrative process for clergy and the right of a clergy person to fair and due process.

In Memorandum 1408, issued March 22, the Judicial Council added specific language to four paragraphs in the 2016 Book of Discipline — the denomination’s law book — to ensure that those directly involved in certain administrative matters would not vote on recommendations brought to the clergy session of annual conference.

The particular administrative matters affected are involuntary leave of absence, involuntary retirement, administrative location and discontinuance from provisional membership.

Covering Disciplinary paragraphs 354, 357.3, 359 and 327.6, the ruling applies to members of an annual conference cabinet, board of ordained ministry, conference relations committee or administrative review committee who can’t vote on these matters at the clergy session “if they were involved in any prior discussions, communications, proceedings and/or decisions.”

The ruling is in response to a request from the United Methodist Council of Bishops, which voted last July to ask for a declaratory decision clarifying Decision 1383. The petition also requested a conditional stay of Decision 1383 “pending legislative action by General Conference.”

The Judicial Council is continuing to deliberate on a 19-item docket in its first virtual meeting since the coronavirus pandemic began. It took the unusual action of releasing one of its opinions prior to the completion of that docket, said the Rev. Kabamba Kiboko, Judicial Council secretary, because Memorandum 1408 bears directly on the question as to whether annual conferences may or should prepare legislation in response to Judicial Council Decision 1383, while also addressing the bishops’ inquiry.

"The members of the Judicial Council are aware that many annual conferences have quickly approaching deadlines for submission of proposed legislation for consideration by their 2021 annual conference sessions,” Kiboko said in a statement to UM News.

Issued on Nov. 1, 2019, Decision 1383 was in response to a request by the Western Pennsylvania Conference. In its ruling, the Judicial Council found that provisions “setting forth the administrative process” in those specific paragraphs of the Discipline violated the guarantees of “a fair and unbiased process” found in church law and were unconstitutional, null and void.

“The fundamental right to fair and due process of an accused clergy person is denied when individuals who were involved in referring, adjudicating, and reviewing an administrative complaint are also permitted to vote on the final disposition in the clergy session of an annual conference,” Decision 1383 said.

Since then, there has been no opportunity for General Conference, the denomination’s top legislative body, to amend the paragraphs deemed unconstitutional.

Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the General Conference originally set for May 5-15, 2020, was postponed. Since then, General Conference has been rescheduled twice, first for Aug. 29-Sept. 7, 2021, and, more recently, for Aug. 29-Sept. 6, 2022. The meeting venue remains in Minneapolis.

Before Judicial Council issued a ruling on the matter, the Council of Bishops had announced a special one-day virtual General Conference, to take place May 8. The first of 12 pieces of legislation for that special session proposed an amendment to Paragraph 354 to comply with Decision 1383. However, the bishops made the decision to cancel the May 8 special session during a March 22 online meeting.

The top court’s memorandum addresses a question in the petition from the bishops about whether an annual conference can continue to employ the administrative process provisions of the paragraphs earlier declared unconstitutional by adopting specific language.

The clarification made in Memorandum 1408 “ensures that the administrative processes continue to remain in effect while bringing the issue of voice and vote into compliance with the fair process requirements of the Constitution,” the council wrote.

“As such, no specific annual conference action is necessary other than to ensure continued compliance with the Discipline, including the voting restrictions that are set forth herein.”

Bloom is assistant news editor emeritus for United Methodist News.

News media contact: [email protected]. To read more United Methodist news, subscribe to the free Daily or Weekly Digests.


Like what you're reading? Support the ministry of UM News! Your support ensures the latest denominational news, dynamic stories and informative articles will continue to connect our global community. Make a tax-deductible donation at ResourceUMC.org/GiveUMCom.

Sign up for our newsletter!

Subscribe Now
General Conference
The Minneapolis Convention Center stands in downtown Minneapolis, Minn. United Methodist organizers plan to make good on the original location of the COVID-delayed 2020 General Conference, choosing Minneapolis as the host city for the next legislative assembly scheduled for May 8-18, 2028. Photo by Dan Anderson, courtesy of Meet Minneapolis. (www.minneapolis.org)

Minneapolis chosen for 2028 General Conference

United Methodist organizers plan to make good on the original location of the COVID-delayed 2020 lawmaking assembly. They also hope to make up the budget deficit from earlier sessions.
Bishops
Council of Bishops President Tracy S. Malone, who also leads the Indiana Conference, officiates at Holy Communion at closing worship for the Council of Bishops meeting, April 27-May 2 in Chicago. During the meeting, the bishops unveiled a new vision statement that they plan to help the denomination live out. Photo by Rick Wolcott, Council of Bishops.

Bishops work to put new vision into action

United Methodist bishops spent much of their spring meeting exploring how they can help fellow churchgoers love boldly, serve joyfully and lead courageously.
Judicial Council
Council of President Tracy S. Malone (center), who also leads the Indiana Conference, addresses her fellow bishops and those watching on livestream on May 2, final day of the Council of Bishops 2025 spring meeting in Chicago. The bishops released a statement late that day trying to ease concerns about a Judicial Council ruling on same-sex weddings. Sitting beside Malone, from left, are Horizon Texas Conference Bishop Ruben Saenz Jr., president-designate, and Bishop L. Jonathan Holston, secretary. Holston leads the Alabama-West Florida and North Alabama conferences. Photo by Rick Wolcott, Council of Bishops.

Bishops respond to same-sex wedding ruling

United Methodist bishops seek to ease concerns after the denomination’s top court ruled that trustees cannot bar a pastor from officiating at same-sex weddings within church walls.

United Methodist Communications is an agency of The United Methodist Church

©2025 United Methodist Communications. All Rights Reserved