Judicial Council rules on apportionment question

The United Methodist high court ruled May 5 that unwillingness by a pastor to lead a local church toward full payment of apportionments is not a chargeable offense.

In the United Methodist Church, apportionments are defined as the funds each annual conference or local church pays to support international, national and regional missions.

The Judicial Council ruling’s “Analysis and Rationale” section did state, however, that any clergy member’s “deliberate” encouragement of a church “not to pay its apportionments in full, when the church is otherwise able to do so … may rise to the level of a chargeable offense under Paragraph 2702” of the church’s Book of Discipline.

The council was asked by the General Conference to determine whether or not a pastor’s unwillingness to counsel his or her church to pay apportionments constituted “failure to perform the work of the ministry” or “disobedience to the order and discipline of the United Methodist Church,” two of the chargeable offenses listed in Paragraph 2702.

The request for a declaratory decision included language in the Book of Discipline (Paragraph 823) related to the “Proportionality” section of the Episcopal Fund, which provides for salary of church bishops. (The Proportionality section states that “the amount apportioned to a charge for the Episcopal Fund shall be paid in the same proportion as the charge pays its pastor.”)

In its ruling, the council affirmed that the duties of a pastor include “leading the congregation in the fulfillment of its mission through full and faithful payment of all apportioned ministerial support, administrative and benevolent funds.” (Paragraph 331.2f)

The decision continued: “The pastor of a church has an important role in leading a local church to … pay its apportionments in full, including the apportionment for the Episcopal Fund, but the pastor does not carry this responsibility alone. The pastor of the church is just one of many individuals, lay and clergy, who have responsibility for providing leadership to a local congregation and thereby leading a local church toward full payment of apportionments. To hold the pastor of a church personally accountable for a chargeable offense when a church under his/her leadership does not pay its apportionments in full, including the requirement for proportionality in the case of the Episcopal Fund, is unjust.

“The clear legislative intent of the list of chargeable offenses in Paragraph 2702 is to hold pastors accountable for their own personal actions, not the actions of other ordained or lay persons.”

*Caldwell is a correspondent for United Methodist News Service.

News media contact: (412) 325-6080 during General Conference, April 27-May 7.  After May 10: (615) 742-5470.

Related

Sign up for our newsletter!

SUBSCRIBE

Latest News

General Conference
Members of the Judicial Council participate in the Feb. 23 morning of prayer at the 2019 Special Session of the United Methodist General Conference in St. Louis. File photo by Kathleen Barry, UMNS.

Court OKs part of Traditional Plan, exit plan

However, United Methodist Judicial Council rules that some key parts of denomination-wide plan are still unconstitutional.
General Church
An empty collection plate.  Photo illustration by Kathleen Barry, UMNS.

Conference offers guidance on apportionment alternatives

California-Pacific Conference leaders advise churches on giving options including withholding or redirecting apportionment contributions in protest of 2019 General Conference.
General Church
Judi Kenaston, Northeastern Jurisdiction, talks with Michelle Hettman, Southeastern Jurisdiction, during the meeting of the Connectional Table held at United Methodist Discipleship Ministries in Nashville, Tenn., April 2.  Photo by Kathleen Barry, UMNS

Leaders pursue plan for new US structure

Despite concerns the homosexuality debate will engulf the plan, the Connectional Table is submitting legislation to create a decision-making body on U.S. matters.