GC2016: Oppose mascots that demean Native Americans

 

Delegates to General Conference 2016 overwhelmingly approved a resolution calling on United Methodist agencies to raise awareness about the harm caused by sports teams that use mascots or symbols that disrespect Native Americans.

The petition that passed May 19 had been amended in the Discipleship Committee, deleting language that would have called on United Methodist groups not to have meetings in cities that have sports teams with such mascots or symbols.

There was a failed effort during plenary to return to the original petition.

Cynthia Ann Taylor, Baltimore-Washington Conference, spoke for moving meetings, saying to do so would be “showing with our money that we will not tolerate racism against Native Americans.”

Challenges noted

Other delegates pointed out the practical challenges of moving meetings when The United Methodist Church has a building in Washington, D.C., that is home to the denomination’s Board of Church and Society, and when the Board of Global Ministries is moving to Atlanta.

The Washington Redskins and Atlanta Braves have been at the center of debates far beyond The United Methodist Church about sports team names and symbols.

Kim Simpson, a Central Texas Conference delegate who noted that she is half Native American, argued during floor debate that by going ahead with meetings in cities with demeaning sports team mascots, the denomination has the contacts and leverage to push for change.

“Then we can make an impact,” she said.

Cynthia Kent, chair of the Native American International Caucus, said she prefers the boycott strategy and was disappointed General Conference did not go back to the original resolution.

She said she would work with her caucus’s board to consider a resolution that the caucus will not attend meetings in cities with sports teams that have mascots demeaning to Native Americans.

Kent added that her caucus would continue leaning on other United Methodist groups not to meet in such places.

“We’re going to work with our agencies and conferences,” she said.

Thomas Kemper, top executive of the Board of Global Ministries, said his agency has been mindful and active on the issue even as it moves to the home of the Atlanta Braves. 

“It’s a justice issue, so we are very clear that we support all efforts to change these mascot names of sports teams,” he said.

Kemper noted that the agency’s Native American ministry has been expanded to include a focus on challenging teams with Native American mascots, including the Braves.

“As soon as we are fully moved to Atlanta, we will intensify these conversations,” Kemper said.

A long church history on mascots

The United Methodist Church has engaged in the issue of sports team names and mascots for years, including through past General Conferences resolutions that had expired. One, approved by General Conference 2004, called on the denomination to have meetings in cities “that do not sponsor sports teams using Native American names and symbols.”

In 2006, the denomination’s Commission on General Conference retracted Richmond, Virginia, as the site of General Conference 2012, having belatedly learned that the city’s minor league baseball team was the Richmond Braves. Tampa, Florida, became the location.

The Rev. David Wilson, a delegate from the Oklahoma Indian Missionary Conference, said the earlier resolution calling for moving meetings “had teeth,” and pointed to the Richmond-to-Tampa move.

But he was glad General Conference 2016 made an official statement.

“It’s a good start,” said Wilson, a member of the Choctaw nation of Oklahoma.

Hodges, a United Methodist News Service writer, lives in Dallas. Contact him at (615) 742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org.

Sign up for our newsletter!

umnews-subscriptions
General Conference
Bishop Kenneth H. Carter speaks during an oral hearing before the United Methodist Judicial Council meeting in Evanston, Ill. Carter is president of the denomination's Council of Bishops. Photo by Mike DuBose, UM News.

Church exit plan already in effect, court says

But the United Methodist Judicial Council has no ruling on Traditional Plan questions from bishops.
General Conference
Bishop Kenneth H. Carter, president of the Council of Bishops, discusses his ideas for the interim time as the church works toward its future. He proposes a moratorium on the complaint process related to LGBTQ infractions alongside a loosening of the trust clause. Video image courtesy of UM News.

Bishop suggests hold on trials, trust clause

The Council of Bishops president proposes coupling a pause in church trials related to LGBTQ restrictions and a relaxation of the denomination’s trust clause.
General Church
United Methodist Judicial Council member Warren Plowden (left) asks a question about the investigation of improper voting during the 2019 United Methodist General Conference. He was questioning Bishop Kenneth H. Carter, president of the denomination's Council of Bishops, and William Waddell, the council's legal advisor, during an oral hearing at the Judicial Council meeting in Evanston, Ill. Photo by Mike DuBose, UM News.

Top court raises questions at lively oral hearing

Judicial Council members wonder about authority, lack of documentation over ruling request on improper voting.