GC2012: Delegates set rules for business

Translate Page
Erin Hawkins, chief executive officer of the General Commission on Religion and Race,
leads a training for delegates on cultural sensitivity during the opening plenary of the
2012 General Conference in Tampa. Fla. A UMNS photo by Skyler E. Nimmons.
Click on image to enlarge.View more photos

TAMPA, Fla. (UMNS) - After more than an hour of discussion - in addition to almost two hours the previous night - delegates to the 2012 General Conference of The United Methodist Church on April 25 approved the rules to guide the work of the legislative committees and full assembly through May 4.

In a sometimes confusing process of keeping amendments, motions and suspensions of rules in order, Bishop Larry M. Goodpaster of the Charlotte (N.C.) Episcopal Area directed discussion of recommendations brought back to the body by the Rules Committee of the Commission on General Conference in response to discussion on the evening of April 24.

18 amendments proposed

During their first business session, delegates proposed 18 amendments to the organization and rules of order. The rules committee brought recommendations on those amendments for consideration during today's plenary.

After more debate over issues addressed the previous night and numerous procedural clarifications, delegates finally approved the rules as originally presented by the committee.

Before the vote, Goodpaster said the business of setting the rules is "tedious" but important. "It is how we govern ourselves while we are together," he said.

With the work ahead of them in mind, several delegates expressed concern over the time spent considering the rules.

"We have to be good stewards of our time, and we need to get on with the business of not perfecting the rules, but how we perfect the church," said the Rev. Sam Powers, Oklahoma Annual (regional) Conference delegate, after urging the body to pass the rules as presented by the committee.

Concerns restated

In both sessions, some delegates called for revising several rules, including those stating the number of representatives from the central and jurisdictional conferences to serve on administrative committees and the deadline for dealing with legislative items.

The conference did not approve an amendment to add two people from two U. S. jurisdictions and two central conferences in Africa with more than 1.5 million members to committees.

Those favoring the amendment said it would enable more people to be present at the table and have a voice. Those opposed said basing membership on the size of a conference or jurisdiction would penalize smaller conferences, arguing that representation should be equal, regardless of size, and that it would incur unwanted expenses in a time when General Conference is focused on reducing costs.

Another amendment - to remove a rule mandating that any legislative issues not addressed by committees by the end of the evening session Saturday would not be considered by the body - also did not pass.

Letting some legislation die would take away the voice of those submitting petitions said Judy Nutter of the West Virginia Annual Conference, who proposed the amendment.

Gerald Rinehart, delegate from the East Ohio Annual Conference, said the rule could be interpreted by non-delegates as a "lack of integrity and trust with the leadership they've elected."

"I think our duty is to consider each and every thing that is brought to us," he said. "That way we can give it a pretty full and honest report once we get out of here."

The Rev. Debbie McLeod from the Florida Annual Conference said the body should trust legislative committees to prioritize their work and the rule was necessary to ensure petitions with the greatest impact are addressed.

"We also have individuals who have presented hundreds of petitions that are borderline ridiculous, so I think we need this rule," she said.

Other delegates said that concerns with the time-limit rule could be addressed by another rule that specifies an issue may be brought before the assembly for consideration if 20 delegates support it.

The committee's recommendations were approved as originally presented with a vote of 849-69.

*Parham is a freelance writer, editor and communications consultant based in Apopka, Fla., and a member of the United Methodist News Service team at General Conference.

News media contact: Tim Tanton, Tampa, Fla., (813) 574-4837, through May; after May 4, Nashville, Tenn. (615) 742-5470, or [email protected]


Like what you're reading? Support the ministry of UM News! Your support ensures the latest denominational news, dynamic stories and informative articles will continue to connect our global community. Make a tax-deductible donation at ResourceUMC.org/GiveUMCom.

Sign up for our newsletter!

UMNEWS-SUBSCRIPTION
General Conference
The next General Conference is scheduled April 23-May 3, 2024, in Charlotte, N.C. The United Methodist Church’s top lawmaking body, long delayed by COVID, will see multiple options for the church’s future when it meets next year. But preparing all the legislation for delegates’ review takes months. Image courtesy of charlottesgotalot.com.

What comes after General Conference deadline?

The United Methodist Church’s top lawmaking body, long delayed by COVID-19, will see multiple options for the church’s future when it meets next year. Preparing all the legislation for delegates’ review takes months.
General Conference
A key leadership body has given unanimous approval to submitting a proposal to General Conference that aims to give Africa, Europe, the Philippines and the U.S. equal standing in church decision-making. The approval by the Standing Committee on Central Conference Matters puts the legislation on a likely trajectory of making it onto the General Conference floor for consideration by all delegates. Globe by OpenClipart-Vectors, courtesy of Pixabay; graphic by Laurens Glass, UM News.

Regionalization plan heads to General Conference

A key United Methodist leadership body has given unanimous approval to moving forward a proposal that aims to give the Africa, Europe, the Philippines and the U.S. equal standing in church decision-making.
Social Concerns
The Rev. Mel West. Photo courtesy of the Rev. Mel West.

‘… and compassion for all.’

The Rev. Mel West suggests adding the word “compassion” to the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance to implant a spirit, an attitude and an action into the hearts and minds of all who recite it.

United Methodist Communications is an agency of The United Methodist Church

©2023 United Methodist Communications. All Rights Reserved