Court OKs submission of other petitions for GC2019

The Rev. Gary George, Commission on General Conference, speaks before members of the United Methodist Judicial Council during a May 22 oral hearing. The court held a special session in Evanston, Ill. The court heard arguments about whether United Methodist organizations, clergy or lay members should be able to submit petitions for the special General Conference in 2019. Photo by Kathleen Barry, UMNS
The Rev. Gary George, Commission on General Conference, speaks before members of the United Methodist Judicial Council during a May 22 oral hearing. The court held a special session in Evanston, Ill. The court heard arguments about whether United Methodist organizations, clergy or lay members should be able to submit petitions for the special General Conference in 2019. Photo by Kathleen Barry, UMNS

The United Methodist Church’s top court has ruled that other petitions — in addition to legislation from the Council of Bishops — can be submitted for the 2019 special session of General Conference.

Any organization, as well as clergy members and lay members, can file a petition for the 2019 special session of General Conference, which is devoted to working through a longstanding impasse over homosexuality. Those petitions must be “in harmony with the purpose stated in the call” for the special session, the United Methodist Judicial Council said in Decision 1360.

In its analysis, the court cited Paragraph 14 of the church’s constitution in declaring that “petitions which are in harmony with any business which may be proposed in the Bishops’ Report are allowed.”

The decision was posted May 25 on the Judicial Council’s website after the conclusion of its meeting at the Hilton Orrington Hotel.

The denomination’s Council of Bishops had requested a declaratory decision on whether petitions inconsistent with the bishops’ own report could be considered at the Special General Conference, set for Feb. 23-26, 2019, in St. Louis. General Conference is the top legislative body of The United Methodist Church.

Be sure to add the alt. text

Judicial Council alternate Warren Plowden (right) questions the Rev. Keith Boyette at a May 22 oral hearing during the council’s special session in Evanston, Ill. Photo by Kathleen Barry, UMNS.

Although the bishops have talked about the broad outlines of the report, it has yet to be made public. Judicial Council held a May 22 oral hearing on the request before beginning its deliberations on a declaratory decision.

The purpose of the call for the special session “is limited to receiving and acting upon a report from the Council of Bishops based on the recommendations of the Way Forward,” the Judicial Council noted in its ruling.

“It is the obligation of the General Conference to determine, in the first instance, through its committees, officers and presiders, acting in accordance with The Discipline and the rules and procedures of the General Conference, whether any such petition is ‘in harmony,’” the ruling said.

Business deemed not “in harmony” is not permitted unless approved by a two-thirds vote of General Conference, Judicial Council said.

Established after General Conference 2016 put petitions related to human sexuality on hold amid open talk of a denominational split, the Commission on a Way Forward finished its work this year.

The Council of Bishops said it was sharing the commission’s work, which was conducted at closed meetings, and recommending the One Church Plan for legislative action by the special General Conference. That plan would loosen current restrictions on same-sex weddings and gay clergy at the conference and local levels. The council also will provide supplementary materials about two other options, the Traditionalist Plan and the Connectional Conference Plan.

In an end note attached to the decision’s “statement of facts” section, the court cited Judicial Council Decision 424 in raising the question of “of whether a special commission created by the General Conference can report to a body other than the General Conference.

“Specifically, is the Commission on a Way Forward amenable to the General Conference or the Council of Bishops, and can it present its findings and report to the General Conference through the Council?”

The language in “An Offering for a Way Forward,” approved by General Conference 2016, “strongly suggests”  the commission’s work was the only rationale for calling a special session, the end note said.

In the analysis of its decision to allow other petitions, Judicial Council cited Paragraph 507 of the Book of Discipline, the denomination’s law book, which allows for a petition from organizations and clergy or lay members “if it meets the criteria set forth therein.” There is no distinction “whether such petitions are to a regular or special session of General Conference,” the court said.

The analysis also noted that Paragraph 14 of the church’s constitution does not restrict the filing of petitions in a special session “as long as the business proposed to be undertaken in such petition is in harmony with the purposed stated in the call. Therefore, petitions which are in harmony with any business which may be proposed in the Bishops’ Report are allowed.”

In an opinion that concurred in part and dissented in part, Beth Capen, a lay member of Judicial Council, wrote that while she agreed with her colleagues “on some points,” she believed that the 2019 General Conference should not receive other petitions “because its purpose is limited to the report emanating from the work of the Commission on a Way Forward.”

Bloom is the assistant news editor for United Methodist News Service and is based in New York.

Follow her at https://twitter.com/umcscribe or contact her at 615-742-5470 or newsdesk@umcom.org. To read more United Methodist news, subscribe to the free Daily or Weekly Digests. 

Latest News

General Conference
Patricia L. Miller is executive director of the United Methodist Confessing Movement and also served on the Commission on a Way Forward. She submitted the legislation for the Connectional Conference Plan to General Conference. Miller spoke with UM News as part of “Seeing a Way Forward,” a video series featuring different perspectives of church leaders on the work of the Commission on a Way Forward.

Seeing a Way Forward: Patricia L. Miller

Patricia L. Miller submitted the legislation for the Connectional Conference Plan to General Conference. She explains why it’s meant to provide the “most space between theological differences” while maintaining unity.
Local Church
Exterior of Glide Memorial United Methodist Church in San Francisco. Photo courtesy of Google street view.

Conference, bishop sue for control of Glide

California-Nevada Conference says legal action is necessary to take back San Francisco's Glide Memorial United Methodist Church from foundation board.

Daily Digest - December 12, 2018

Little interest for Connectional Conference Plan; Does Christmas have pagan roots?; Prisoners pray for churches

Sign up for our newsletter!

SUBSCRIBE